Some of the images used in tonight's lab are from earlier versions of FSL (and/or from FSL running on a Linux machine), so they might not always look identical to what you see when running the program. However, the display should be very similar. I have updated the images in all cases in which the display looks substantially different.
This lab will continue the analysis that you started in in the previous lab. Last time, you used FSL to analyze two (for the Motor task) or three (for the Face task) runs of data from a single subject. Tonight you will conduct Second Level Analysis that will combine the results across those runs. You will then perform a Third Level analysis (aka 'Group'), which will combine the data across several subjects.
Your lab report is due one week from tonight.
The lab report questions for tonight's lab are listed below (these will be shown again at the relevant sections throughout the lab). Tonight's lab has two parts. Usually, these would be two separate lab reports (LR 7 and LR 8). But I'd like you to submit them as a single MS Word document (with your last name in the filename).
Some general things to keep in mind while completing your lab report and preparing your figures:
Show colour bar
.~/Desktop/output/lab07
As mentioned in the last lab, a second level analysis combines the results of two or more first level analyses, and thus provides summary statistics across the runs for an individual subject.
A run
refers to a single continuous data acquisition period. There are several reasons you would divide your study up into separate chunks. One reasons is to give your subjects intermittent rest periods. So if you have an experiment that requires 40 minutes to complete, you might break that up into eight 5-minute runs
.
The inputs to a second level analysis are not raw image volumes, but rather consist of the first level statistics and variances. For that reason, second level analyses run much faster than first level analyses.
FSL uses a sophisticated approach to combining First Level Analyses into a Higher Order Analysis that is discussed here.
To save yourself a lot of traversing through file manager boxes to find the relevant files, launch fsl
from a terminal in which you first change your current directory to a helpful place. For example, you might first cd /Users/hnl/Desktop/output/lab07
and then start fsl fsl &
.
1. Initiate a second-level analysis in FEAT
Higher Level Analysis
drop down button at the top of the FEAT
GUIFirst Level Analysis
, so you have to click on it to choose the Higher Level Analysis
.
When you choose Higher Level Analysis
, the GUI box changes to a more simplified set of options than are available for First Level Analysis
. This is because the pre-processing steps carried out images volumes in First Level Analysis are not needed for Higher Level Analyses. Here is the GUI that you should see.
2. Specify Input
For those of you analyzing the motor task, and thefore only have two runs of data for your subject, you'll need to do the following before you input your data:
Stats
tabFixed effects
modelData
tabIf you are analyzing the motor task, and therefore only have 2 runs
You will be providing as your input to the second level analysis, the output directories created in your first level analyses.
Inputs are lower-level FEAT directories
as your input source.Number of inputs
to however many first level analyses your ran (3 for faces, 2 for motor)Select FEAT directories
~/Desktop/output/lab07/run01.feat
3. Specify output
/Users/hnl/Desktop/output/lab07/allruns
in the Output Directory
box.The stats tab is used to specify your statistical model.
Fixed Effects
model (see box below).Model setup wizard
and choose the default. Press Process
when you are finished.In brief, a fixed-effects model is appropriate when “averaging” across runs because we are not trying to generalize the results beyond our sample. The across-runs results *is* the effect for our participant.
However, this would not be appropriate when “averaging” across participants, because we will be using those results to generalize beyond our sample. So in that case we would use a random-effects model.
The Post-stats tab will look the same as for the first level analysis. You must choose a method for correcting for multiple comparisons. The default is to use a cluster correction such that a single voxel is considered significant with a Z threshold
of 3.1
(equal to p < .001). The cluster correction will then further restrict significant voxels to only those in clusters with a Cluster correction threshold
of p < .05
.
For your lab, I want you to compare two different methods for correcting for multiple comparisons. We will compare the results of analyzing the data uncorrected
with the results when we use cluster
correction.
When FEAT
runs additional analyses with the same output folder specified, it appends a +
to the output folder name. This is convenient, in that you don't overwrite your prior output. So, be sure to pay attention to what output folder you are examining.
1. Run the Uncorrected
second-level analysis
Thresholding
to Uncorrected
Uncorrected voxel p threshold
to .01
.Go
2. When the Uncorrected analysis is finished (the HTML file will no longer read 'Still Running'), re-run the second-level analysis using a cluster
correction.
Thresholding
to Cluster
Z threshold
to 2.3
(this is equivalent to the p < .01 voxel threshold we used above)Cluster P threshold
to .001
Go
You will compare the output of these two analyses as part of the next section.
To get a quick overview of your results you can explore the HTML output file. If you click on Results
you will see a list of the four contrasts you specified. You can click on any of these to see the results overlaid on a series of 2D “slices.”
This is a convenient way to get a quick look, but that format is too rigid to explore your results. You also can't overlay different results on the same background image as the HTML output is not interactive. So in this section we will use FSLeyes
to drill down into your data.
When FSL combines data from different sources (e.g., run01
and run02
), it does not assume that the data were originally located in the same 'brain space' (even though, in this case, they were). It thus combines the data into a common space. In your second level analysis, the statistical overlays are (by default) in MNI152_2mm space. Thus, we will overlay your statistics on the MNI152_T1_2mm_brain
.
1. Load the MNI152_T1_2mm_brain
in FSLeyes
If the brain looks super fuzzy, you probably loaded the MIN152lin
brain by mistake.
You can now overlay one or more statistical results.
FEAT
creates lots of output files. I've highlighted some critical directories and files below. A full list and description of these files can be found here.
The statistical overlays are located in the output folder that you specified for you second level analysis. This folder will contain several sub-folders - for example, cope1.feat
, cope2.feat
, cope3.feat
, and cope4.feat
. COPE
stands for contrasts of parameter estimates.
Remember, the parameter estimates (aka beta values) are the estimated values that represent how much of a particular expected activation template exists in each voxel of the brain. That is, how much of the variance can be explained by our model.
We contrast differences in how much variance is explained by different experimental conditions. So, a COPE might tell us whether the how much of the estimated face activation template exists in a particular voxel statistically differs from the how much of the estimated scene activation template for that same voxel.
In our analysis of the face task:
The file names within each of these COPE folders are identical, so it is essential that you take your time and be absolute sure that you are always in the directory you want to be in / think you're in.
At the top level of the folder is a file named thresh_zstat1.nii.gz
. This is the z statistic map for the specified contrast that has been corrected for multiple comparisons by whichever method you selected. It is a 3D volume, as the z statistic was calculated at all voxels. However, z scores that were above your threshold for significance (i.e., p > .05) have been eliminated. Thus, when you overlay this image on your background brain, you will only see color where the differences met your significance criterion.
Let's explore the effect of cluster correction by looking at the results from cope3
(face > scene or right hand > left hand)
2. Load uncorrected
second-level analysis
File
⇒ Add overlay from file
⇒ the thresh_zstat1.nii.gz
from the cope3
directory of your uncorrected second-level analysisallruns.gfeat
directoryGreyscale
to Blue-Lightblue
3. Load cluster corrected
second-level analysis
File
⇒ Add overlay from file
⇒ the thresh_zstat1.nii.gz
from the cope3
directory of your corrected second-level analysisallruns+.gfeat
directoryGreyscale
to Red-Yellow
You can now compare the effect of multiple comparisons correction. The red voxels (corrected) are on top of the blue voxels (uncorrected). So anyplace you see a blue voxel is a location that is being reported as significant in the uncorrected analysis but not significant in the cluster corrected analysis.
Lab Report Part 1A
Before proceeding, remove the uncorrected results from your Overlay list by highlighting the file and clicking the -
button. If done correctly, all of the blue voxels will disappear.
4. Click around in the brain and see if you can identify areas of particularly “strong” activation. If you have a very active participant, it might help to raise the Min
value to something higher than 0
. This number is the minimum z-score that a voxel must have in order to be shown. So the higher you make it, the fewer voxels you'll see. But those voxels that remain will be the most active (the highest z-scores).
Try changing the Min
value from 0
to 2
. You'll notice that the colors change a little because the color-bar has been rescaled to have 2
as the minimum. But importantly, you won't see any voxels disappear. Huh? I thought raising the minimum would get rid of voxels with z < 2. So why don't we observe a change.
Let me know if you figure it out.
Where am I?
To identify where in the brain a particular voxel is located, you can use the FSLeyes
atlas tools. Press option
+ command
+ 6
to add the atlas pane to the bottom of the FSLeyes
window (It might take the atlas a few seconds to load). Now, as you click around in the brain, FSLeyes
will report where you are in the brain according the the Harvard-Oxford Atlas.
Lab Report Part 1B
Tip: If you have a very active participant with big clusters, you'll want to raise the Min
value until the clusters are small enough for you to localize them on the anatomy.
5. Load results of your scene > face (or left hand > right hand) contrast.
File
⇒ Add overlay from file
⇒ the thresh_zstat1.nii.gz
from the cope4
directory of your cluster corrected second-level analysisExplore the results the same way you did in the last part (it might be helpful to hide those results).
Lab Report Part 1C
Tip: If you have a very active participant with big clusters, you'll want to raise the Min
value until the clusters are small enough for you to localize them on the anatomy.
You should now have completed and explored a second level analysis of your subject's data. The next step is a third level analysis in which you combine the second level analyses from two or more subjects. We have fifteen subjects in each of our two tasks: face and motor. Your third level analysis will combine the data from all of them.
Normally, you would first have to conduct first and second level analyses for each of these subjects before proceeding to the third level step. However, because you now have done this for one subject, there is nothing more to learn by running the additional subjects needed for your third level analysis except patience (and the value of scripting!). Therefore, these analyses have already been done for you and you can proceed directly to the third level analysis.
The following fifteen participated in the Motor and Face tasks:
2545 2552 2553 2554 2585 2731 2766 2767 2814 3850 3855 5743 5744 5769 5770
Note: averaging our results across 16 subjects would improve our SNR by 4 times (square root of 16).
The second level analysis results for the face study are located in the following location for each participant:
~/Desktop/input/fmri/loc/analysis/fsl/SUBJ/face_allruns.gfeat
The second level analysis results for the motor study are located in the following location for each participant:
~/Desktop/input/fmri/loc/analysis/fsl/SUBJ/motor_allruns.gfeat
Within the TASK_allruns.gfeat
directory there is
The input to third level analysis will be the relevant cope file, cope1.feat
within the second level allruns.gfeat
directory the results for each cope are in their own subdirectories:
cope1.feat
(Task B)cope2.feat
(Task A)cope3.feat
(Task B > Task A)cope4.feat
(Task A > Task B)The third level analysis combines the data for each cope across all subjects. So each time you run a third level analysis, you are focusing solely on just one of your first/second level contrasts. This means that you need to run four separate third level analyses for your experiment, one for each COPE.
1. Open FEAT if it is not open already and select Higher-level analysis
(instead of First-level analysis
)
2. Set Number of inputs
to 15
inputs (one per each of subjects who were run in your task of interest).
3. Click on Select FEAT directories
. This will open a window in which you need to specify the names of your COPE directories - one per subject.
Typing out the long path to each cope.feat directory would be laborious and error prone. Instead, I recommend you use the folder icon to manually select the first directory and then copy and paste that to the remaining 14 fields (see yellow tip box below for cut and paste instructions on this system). Of course, you'll then need to go in and change the subject number on each line, but this is still much easier than the alternative.
After you select the first file, and before you copy it to the other 14 fields, I recommend that you replace /Users/hnl
with ~
. This makes the path short enough that you can see the cope number. This will make your life easier because you'll need to change that number on each line each time you run third level analysis on a different cope.
How to Cut and Paste
X11
(aka XQuartz
) is a window system that allows us to use the graphical user interface of Unix-based programs like FSL. Unfortunately, the cut and paste function in X11 does not work exactly as you might expect.
To copy text: You can copy text just as you would elsewhere in the operating system.
X11
icon in your dock (the black X in an orange circle)Edit
⇒ Copy
Command
+C
To paste text: Pasting is where things get weird (relative to what you're used to).
X11
⇒ Preferences
and then on the Emulate 3 button mouse
option
key and clicking where you want the text inserted.
4. Specify your Output directory
for the COPE
you are analyzing. For instance, /Users/hnl/Desktop/output/lab07/allsubs_cope1
Go to the Stats
tab and set up your third level model. Our model is simple, and so we can click on the Model setup wizard
and choose single group average
. Note, when we ran our second level analysis we used a Fixed effects model. Here we are averaging across different participants, so we will use the default Mixed effects: FLAME 1
model. We're using Mixed effects
because our run level information is fixed effects, but our participant level information is random effects
As in our second level analysis, we now need to select the Post-stats
tab and choose a Thresholding
criterion. As I've mentioned, there is no 'one size fits all' multiple comparisons correction. So we will need to specify different methods depending on whether you're analyzing the face
or motor
task.
For the Face / Scene task
Voxels along the fusiform gyrus are known to be highly sensitive to faces. However, the activation can be fairly localized (i.e., not many voxels in the cluster). This can make cluster correction too conservative. So to ensure that we see fusiform gyrus activation in our sample, we will use an Uncorrected
threshold of .0005
. So we're telling FSL to only show us voxels with very high z scores, but don't worry about whether there are a lot of them clustered together.
For the Motor task
Basic motor and perception tasks create huge (by fMRI standards) activations. So we're going to use an extremely stringent statistical threshold. We will use a Cluster
correction with a Z threshold of 4.27
(that's equal to p = .00001!!) and a Cluster P threshold of .01
.
The uncorrected z-statistics image is always provided in addition to whatever thresholding criterion you choose.
1. Run your third level analysis
Go
button.A browser window should open and you can follow your results in the same way that you followed your second level results.
Your analyses should be complete and it is now time to examine your results. As discussed above for the second level analysis, the HTML output is too inflexible to explore your results. I suggest you use FSLeyes
.
As with the second level analysis, the statistical overlays are named thresh_zstat1.nii.gz
and are located in a subdirectory (see warning box below) of each of the four output folders that you specified for your four third level analyses. One per COPE.
allsubs_cope1.gfeat
allsubs_cope2.gfeat
allsubs_cope3.gfeat
allsubs_cope4.gfeat
This gets confusing!
Each of your allsubs_copeX.gfeat
directories has a cope1.feat
subdirectory. This is where you will find the relevant results file, thresh_zstat1.nii.gz
.
The confusing part is that the subdirectory is named cope1.gfeat
regardless of the cope number of the parent directory! This is because third-level analysis focused on a single cope (e.g., cope 4), so the output directory will always be cope 1
.
So, if you want to load your results for cope 4, you will find the file in allsubs_cope4.gfeat/cope1.feat
.
The structure of FEAT
results directories are like nested Russian dolls. Angry, bitter, unforgiving, Russian dolls. Be careful. Always be absolutely certain you are in the correct directory!!
Examine these results as you did before for the second level.
Remember from before,
1. Display your group results
MNI152_2mm_brain
Pink
Coppper
Red-Yellow
Blue-lightblue
Lab Report Part 2
As with the second level analyses, FSL
also stores the unthresholded (i.e., “raw”) z statistic volume in a subdirectory within your individual output folders called /stat
. The relevant file here is zstat1.nii.gz
. If you overlay this file, you will see what the z statistic was at every voxel in the brain. If you are still feeling adventurous, you can load this unthresholded z statistic image and use the contrast limits in FSLeyes
to show only those voxels that are above a z score that you choose. For example, as discussed in a prior lab, you can choose a z score that is equivalent to a Bonferroni correction.