You are all no longer Padawan learners, but have become young fMRI Jedis (that's right, I'm using Star Wars references. I apologize for nothing!!). In this last project you will show off your newly acquired mastery of the brain imaging force (okay okay, I'll stop now) and perform a complete fMRI analysis.
This fMRI report is due on Wed Apr 22nd @ 7:00 pm
See below for specific instructions on how to submit.
This assignment will be very similar to the lab reports you've done throughout the semester. The primary difference is that I will not furnish you with a step-by-step guide for carrying out the analyses.
For the fMRI analysis you will act as if you're newly minted fMRI researchers, not students. However, there is no scientist who knows and remembers everything and can work in total isolation without the aid of colleagues, references, and the internet. So you are allowed to use any resource you'd like, including our lab wikis, to assist you in your analyses. This also means you are permitted to ask each other for assistance. However, you are not permitted to work together. That is, asking for a little help here and there when you get really stuck with something is fine, but I expect you to primarily work independently.
What do I mean when I say you can each other for a “little help”, but that you are not permitted to work together?
Pretend your classmates are professional colleagues with whom you have a friendly relationship. You would definitely not hesitate to reach out to such a colleague if you hit a brick wall and needed some advice. But you certainly would not fill up their inbox and expect them to hold your hand through your analysis.
Go Slow. Be Methodical.
Go Slow. Be Methodical. I really can't stress this enough. You have all experienced first hand how the seemingly smallest mistakes can cause fMRI analysis to go off the rails. What's worse is that sometimes this happens in ways that aren't so obvious. Your analysis might complete without errors, but you'll end up with invalid results. Go Slow. Be Methodical.
Go Slow. Be Methodical. Setting up analyses can be repetitive and tedious, so it's only natural to want to breeze through it. But you must fight the temptation to just click-click-click-Go. I can't begin to count the many dozens of hours I've spent re-doing analyses because I was hasty and careless the first time. Think about each setting as you set it. Make sure you understand why you're using it, and that you're setting it correctly. Go Slow. Be Methodical.
yourlastname_410_fmri
first-level
second-level
third-level
first-level
folder.second-level
folder.cope3.gfeat
directory in the third-level
folderYou must use the follow directory names. Failure to do so will result in a loss of points. When I evaluate your analysis I will write programs to assist me. These programs will assume that the data are in the directories exactly as specified below. If you use a different name you will not get points for that section.
For instance, if you enter run2
, instead of run02
you will lose points.
Throughout the wiki, replace:
SUBJ
with the ID of your assigned subjectTASK
with the task name (motion
)RUN
with whatever run you are analyzing (e.g., run02
)- Create a subject directory on your computer.
mkdir -p ~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ
- Create a third-level output directory on your computer.
mkdir -p ~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/third_level
It has long been known that specific parts of the visual system are particularly sensitive to the perception of motion. More recently it has been discovered that the brain also has regions that are specifically sensitive to biological motion (see example below). This is analogous to face perception in that we know the visual system has some areas that prefer objects to non-objects, but that face “objects” have their own dedicated region.
Point-light display movies are used to identify these biological motion sensitive areas. The movies are simply lights on a black background. Nonetheless, when these lights are placed at particular locations on a body in motion, we easily perceive it as a body and not just randomly moving lights.
So why use point-light movies instead of just a video of a person walking? Good question. The reason point-light movies are great is that it is very easy to create an excellent control condition. The only stimulation reaching your eyes are discs of light in motion. To create a great control condition we simply need to scramble around the location of those discs (see example below). Doing so totally disrupts the perception of biological motion, but preserves all other facets of the display (total luminance, number of items, speed and direction of the individual lights, etc.)
If you're interested in seeing just how powerful these simple motion cues are, check out this site on which you can change things like gender and mood!
Check out examples of what these movies look like:
Right click
on each of the movies below and select Loop
(Use Google Chrome)
Biological motion is known to activate a region of the lateral temporal cortex (particularly in the right hemisphere) that is very near two related areas; the posterior superior temporal sulcus, which activates to faces, and area MT/V5, which is the motion sensitive area of the visual system. This paper is the first to show this using neuroimaging (this was in 1996, so they used Positron Emission Tomography, not fMRI).
In this image (Engell and McCarthy, 2013, NeuroImage), you can see regions of the brain that have the highest probability of being activated by biological motion more strongly than by non-biological motion. You can see that this set of areas is very similar to the one activated preferentially by faces. Activation in the right hemisphere includes the fusiform gyrus, the posterior superior temporal sulcus, area MT/V5 (which is selective for motion in general), and the “extrastriate body area” (which is preferentially activated by the perception of body parts).
Another very cool way to see what results you should expect is to check out http://neurosynth.org/analyses/terms/biological/, which is kinda like a Google search engine for brain activations. The link will take you to the activations associated with biological motion. See here for a primer on Neurosynth.
Pay Attention to Task Parameters
These parameters may be similar to the block design you've analyzed in the last few weeks, but they are not necessarily identical.
Subjects in the this study were instructed to view short movies depicting point-light displays of biological or non-biological (random) motion. Between blocks there were rest periods in which the subjects viewed a small fixation cross on a grey background. Occasionally a “movie” would appear in which nothing was moving. Subjects were instructed to count how many of these static movies appeared and report this number at the end of each run. This task is not relevant for our investigation. Rather, it was used solely to ensure the participant continued to pay attention to the movies.
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Number of runs | 3 |
Volumes (e.g., TRs) per run | 150 |
bio blocks per run | 6 |
nonbio blocks per run | 6 |
rest blocks per run | 13 |
Block duration | 12 seconds |
Block order | rest1 ⇒ bio1 ⇒ Rest2 ⇒ nonbio1 ⇒ rest3 … bio6 ⇒ rest12 ⇒ nonbio6 ⇒ rest13 |
For this project we will not explicitly model the presentation of the static movies. Because they occurred in both the bio- and non-bio- conditions, any activation they evoked will 'cancel out' in our contrast.
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Field Strength | 3.0 T |
Head Coil | 12-channel |
Sequence | Echo Planar Imaging |
Martix | 64 x 64 |
Slices | 37 |
Field of View | 22.4 cm |
Voxel size (x,y,z) | 3.5 mm x 3.5 mm x 3.5 mm |
Orientation | Axial |
TR | 2000 ms |
TE | 25 ms |
Flip angle | 90° |
Slice order | 1,3,5…,37,2,4,6,…36 |
You are assigned a single subject (see below), who has three runs of data. Run 1st level analyses on all three runs of data.
Name | Subject IDs |
---|---|
Lizzie | 2545 |
Jay | 2553 |
Srila | 2554 |
Scout | 2585 |
Julia | 2731 |
Laura | 2585 |
Caitlyn | 2767 |
Sarah | 5770 |
Katrina | 2814 |
Sam | 2545 |
Frank | 2553 |
Data (anatomical and functional) for your assigned subject is located in /Users/hnl/Desktop/class/input/fmri/loc/data/nifti
SUBJ_highres.nii.gz
SUBJ_coplanar.nii.gz
SUBJ_motion_run1.nii.gz
SUBJ_motion_run2.nii.gz
SUBJ_motion_run3.nii.gz
You will carry out first-, second-, and third-level analyses on data from this experiment.
Data should be:
First-level Output Directories
Anatomical data:
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ/SUBJ_coplanar_brain
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ/SUBJ_highres_brain
Analyses:
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ/run01
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ/run02
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ/run03
NOTE: You need specify the correct output directory for the runs, but FSL
will create them.
Perform a fixed-effects second-level analysis for your assigned participant. Results should be cluster corrected with a voxel z threshold of 2.3 and a cluster threshold of p < .05.
Second-level Output Directory
'~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/SUBJ/allruns
NOTE: You need specify the correct output directory for allruns
, but FSL
will create it.
In addition to your assigned subject, there are sixteen additional subjects. You will run a third-level analysis across all seventeen subjects. However, as with your previous lab, you do not have to do the first or second level analysis first as it has been done for you.
Run a mixed-effects (FLAME1) third-level analysis. Results should be cluster corrected with a voxel z threshold of 3.1 and a cluster threshold of p < .05.
Data are located in ~/Desktop/class/input/fsl/loc/analysis/fsl
in the following subdirectories:
2545 2552 2553 2554 2585 2731 2766 2767 2814 3850 3851 3855 3866 5743 5744 5769 5770
You should use the second-level analysis that you created for your participant. For all other participants you can use the second-level analysis that I created for you.
Third-level Output Directories
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/third_level/cope1
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/third_level/cope2
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/third_level/cope3
~/Desktop/yourLastName_fmri_proj/third_level/cope4
You will write-up your results a brief report in the style of a journal article, which includes the following sections.
Introduction
Here's a brief (though somewhat old) review to get you started. Puce & Perrett, 2003
Methods
Write the methods and results section as if you performed the first- and second-level analyses on all seventeen participants.
For an example of how to write the fMRI methods and what to include, see Shultz, van den Honert, Engell, & McCarthy, 2014
Results
See the various example papers throughout this wiki (and those you find for your brief lit review) to understand how results are reported. While you do report the parameters used in various processing stages, you do not discuss the results of “first- or second-level” analysis. Indeed, those are terms specific to the FSL
software and would be meaningless to a reader who happens to use AFNI
..
Don't forget to label which hemisphere is “R” and to include MNI coordinates.
Discussion
References
I would like the paper formatted like a professional manuscript. I have therefore made available a template manuscript from which you can work (this was ultimately published in the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience in 2018). Of course, your paper does not need to be this long and so I've included reminders of your project's min/max word count at the start of each section.